Private lending investment in Canada: one mortgage, or a share of many.
A private lending investment in Canada reaches the same asset class two ways. In a direct or syndicated mortgage you hold a charge, or a share of one, registered against a specific property. In a MIC you hold shares in a corporation that owns a pool of mortgages. The difference is not a detail — it changes the risk, the paperwork, the regulator and the work.
Shares in a corporation that owns a pool of mortgages
A charge, or an undivided interest in one, registered on title to a specific property
Diversification
Exposure to the whole book; one default is absorbed across the pool
One borrower, one property. Their default is your default
Who does the work
The manager and licensed administrator service, renew and enforce
You do — or you pay a licensed administrator to
Regulation of the offering
Securities law. Shares are securities, distributed under prospectus exemptions through a registered dealer
In Ontario, syndicated mortgages moved under securities regulation in 2021; non-syndicated private mortgages arranged by a brokerage remain under FSRA
Disclosure you receive
Offering memorandum with audited financial statements, plus statutory rights of action
An investor/lender disclosure statement signed by a licensed broker, delivered before funds are advanced
Liquidity
Illiquid; redemption per the articles and offering memorandum, with notice periods
Illiquid until the mortgage is discharged or the charge is sold
Tax
Dividends deemed to be interest
Mortgage interest, taxed as interest
Failure mode
Portfolio-level: a run of defaults or falling values compresses or suspends distributions
Single-file: enforcement, a power of sale, legal cost and time — on the one asset you own
Neither structure is safer in the abstract. A direct mortgage on a strong property at conservative loan-to-value can be an excellent investment; a pooled book of weak files is not made safe by being pooled. What diversification buys you is protection from being wrong about one borrower.
Direct suits you if
You want to see and approve the specific property and borrower
You have the expertise to assess an appraisal and a title search
You can carry the time and cost of enforcement if it goes wrong
You are comfortable with all your capital exposed to one file
A MIC suits you if
You want mortgage income without underwriting mortgages
You would rather spread the risk across many loans
You want the income inside a registered plan
You want someone licensed to be responsible for servicing and enforcement
Want to talk it through with a Dealing Representative?